bach.slot type function compared to max function | noticeable difference of interpolation output
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:06 pm
Hy Daniele,
Little question concerning the calculation for the interpolation in a Bach.slot function.
I compared the interpolation output of the max function to the bach.slot type function.
When I interpolate a y-coordinate by giving the x-coordinate I get a noticeable difference between the output of the bach.slot type function and the max-function – see copy compressed.
Could you maybe explain why?
Sorry I'm dumb as Münchhausen in math, but this would be nice to understand – at least roughly.
The reason why I need to understand it better is because I'd like to replace some max-functions with bach.slot. But as I get this differences its a bit annoying because interpolation results will differ a lot.
Thanks in advance.
M
<pre><code>
----------begin_max5_patcher----------
1576.3oc6assbihCD8YmuBJp8wLtjD22m186HUJWxfbrlEKQAh33cp4ee0EL
FBBGaGmryXhmTvfDRsNmtUqFn0Otal6R9KjJWm+z4AmYy9wcyloKRUvrlqm4
tA+RZNtReato7MaHLg68l5DjWD5xoLAorfmiETNyojTUmKbVUx23rDmtddUN
usM4TFIkWyzMD0TXgrIx9U27E1uCrHcMk8zhRRpvLj8AyA263CiTmfA5q77l
CbdroMr5MTVNQnG6vlBoY5QLe42+FLw8vcxqE6uUfpved2cpC2+gwLxl6rpl
kpp35SNdAwZ9HN9hYm3Od1IkyKynLrfT4PYUzLxYPKCAcPjmFlAgWLnitdfl
Q1J6xAXVOinfWJv4N+kTDNszhQdhcEDCbbcuWc6rmbaG+1zzvv4AG.MDoNgP
mCn8rC58LcE9YR1B4cJk4BrPTRWVKLNNl0h8YtOSJqjJMYerjTppLF.AZhyv
bmK+sgTUgehLxTJGv7v3..x8Mmk3MJ8dLZ03cY+7mX3wYUjEVEYmUgWep.57
GP2S1aw4wCMPGBCTmht.d.d83gU4bYmbFyWVwK2f0HI7HPz3qLLQcz3z3rl+
ztLRAtDugHUIKHL7xb8vBXep0UzHPNQH.5ABcuH8KRpRCZMzu.8azGuYdNsR
jUuo3BQXXbGK33nyFgAe7HDL2w7GT+22.yQAWFZ8CR5tF3asbfE35c8fqZwh
Z5kAjlHXZTaPKyKU8tYI0mR447R2Sc8tqnBcP7s6GKFOK5gd6APmAu8UKOlm
Mad2XBlziidj72kTbd6nXqLjKIoRWRyohcut+G2IHLvDBkmw7IoavSJq0NfC
z.oCG5MvVgS64.ThISXQrSVOYWM40QHUz+UKDsYto3sq44jE0TkRYQFVfW.Z
+0vlF8ki6CpCpKnrU78E.2WglYkm2vypkwuqrubberscZsi77gfU6V6+P1IO
A5UVoT4oaxhWZ9mx5YgbQMrHzusPS6.m38AAQnvDOjebOYIQUwYIqNCSR2XH
5CqmJk5mdkrqhgK5WTFeClx9j.pQXuC3JHajQiiykpYcOv3LRe7HM6IrrApy
szLw5t8P+VslPeZs1LCWK38qKkWra6ZBqpPN6bPGiSSkKSXTE3LLKaaIUbXL
0dinWaopLkcraO9k05WVq++Zs5Y0ZU9DLpn6rarZsxOQa0X..FFmD9YXqlQV
gqyEtmt8UbRreDv+WNyC3EYd3a2YlB7iafLR02ntyNSSDvMhkQvXNNF0owWN
Ll.NLBG2gwQbV7kihaWGEQVsHzuiEqFDCqwl8vuuQbEaeFBMmbjUTsV6up7x
kYmjXkWpJFywwvZ9L8aDBAPHB7Y3232WScHvpNMW9ytNcXM2Vy8gPqDh5iwX
iNFBraqo7P6uqD02naRRG1eXb0GBdRRG1e3Sn+DkNr+DWpOaxjjNr+jFvvIJ
cXOLaUlyLIoC6QYqxdpIIcXO3ZUp1MEoCzf3Ry1I+ezzJ67g8ZMbha1sRz5n
AAmluqbTNYrGS2M+lgOFDcJtTPSqMYM5HzxQtkF9A6dqLKZP3pLtfrV1lw7p
Xq1FVY8MCqLHpULShb73e72QmIItY3D6gthlngthrG5JZhF5JxdnqnIZnqH6
gthlngthrG5JZhF5pm8WopGX5QG8dw6hpAYJ307M9Ctn2p+Y+MH+PZfGBFCh
Rh78eE80lXnCSNy1smvCNPmGuj8Dvq1rP81.DGxu0HUVtiRlGF.f9AI6+od.
d+4v3X+nn8YIpbQyjj49AdgPu8k4eHUk694S5j3pCxY21u2r8j2sIuyT8Pat
qpmVzoOur7z8M2uBn3yeGK3uOoqyxJ3TlnZwVpX8hz5xmICxG3lycx746M4z
dOMrd.q2bWuZSHpgsp79p8JdcY5d1sEHNG.dFoRn1MYMZlGZ2fBiZZcpRR+t
OeKAAM2y6SPlA6wki20PPdmBhPWCtC9IwcImhb5OX3kYlruG7gK4War1JZ36
RzAmineefT2Kn2PVdCrXLSywEEMa4AsXTBQ5G+6lMSP785KoLykZeVx0ielV
00IqKtT5MTHcEVWZ1yCuD56ZZpzwYIql1vmR3IEodMBUvKUEM6EA8RI28y69
O7KZv9.
-----------end_max5_patcher-----------
</code></pre>
Little question concerning the calculation for the interpolation in a Bach.slot function.
I compared the interpolation output of the max function to the bach.slot type function.
When I interpolate a y-coordinate by giving the x-coordinate I get a noticeable difference between the output of the bach.slot type function and the max-function – see copy compressed.
Could you maybe explain why?
Sorry I'm dumb as Münchhausen in math, but this would be nice to understand – at least roughly.
The reason why I need to understand it better is because I'd like to replace some max-functions with bach.slot. But as I get this differences its a bit annoying because interpolation results will differ a lot.
Thanks in advance.
M
<pre><code>
----------begin_max5_patcher----------
1576.3oc6assbihCD8YmuBJp8wLtjD22m186HUJWxfbrlEKQAh33cp4ee0EL
FBBGaGmryXhmTvfDRsNmtUqFn0Otal6R9KjJWm+z4AmYy9wcyloKRUvrlqm4
tA+RZNtReato7MaHLg68l5DjWD5xoLAorfmiETNyojTUmKbVUx23rDmtddUN
usM4TFIkWyzMD0TXgrIx9U27E1uCrHcMk8zhRRpvLj8AyA263CiTmfA5q77l
CbdroMr5MTVNQnG6vlBoY5QLe42+FLw8vcxqE6uUfpved2cpC2+gwLxl6rpl
kpp35SNdAwZ9HN9hYm3Od1IkyKynLrfT4PYUzLxYPKCAcPjmFlAgWLnitdfl
Q1J6xAXVOinfWJv4N+kTDNszhQdhcEDCbbcuWc6rmbaG+1zzvv4AG.MDoNgP
mCn8rC58LcE9YR1B4cJk4BrPTRWVKLNNl0h8YtOSJqjJMYerjTppLF.AZhyv
bmK+sgTUgehLxTJGv7v3..x8Mmk3MJ8dLZ03cY+7mX3wYUjEVEYmUgWep.57
GP2S1aw4wCMPGBCTmht.d.d83gU4bYmbFyWVwK2f0HI7HPz3qLLQcz3z3rl+
ztLRAtDugHUIKHL7xb8vBXep0UzHPNQH.5ABcuH8KRpRCZMzu.8azGuYdNsR
jUuo3BQXXbGK33nyFgAe7HDL2w7GT+22.yQAWFZ8CR5tF3asbfE35c8fqZwh
Z5kAjlHXZTaPKyKU8tYI0mR447R2Sc8tqnBcP7s6GKFOK5gd6APmAu8UKOlm
Mad2XBlziidj72kTbd6nXqLjKIoRWRyohcut+G2IHLvDBkmw7IoavSJq0NfC
z.oCG5MvVgS64.ThISXQrSVOYWM40QHUz+UKDsYto3sq44jE0TkRYQFVfW.Z
+0vlF8ki6CpCpKnrU78E.2WglYkm2vypkwuqrubberscZsi77gfU6V6+P1IO
A5UVoT4oaxhWZ9mx5YgbQMrHzusPS6.m38AAQnvDOjebOYIQUwYIqNCSR2XH
5CqmJk5mdkrqhgK5WTFeClx9j.pQXuC3JHajQiiykpYcOv3LRe7HM6IrrApy
szLw5t8P+VslPeZs1LCWK38qKkWra6ZBqpPN6bPGiSSkKSXTE3LLKaaIUbXL
0dinWaopLkcraO9k05WVq++Zs5Y0ZU9DLpn6rarZsxOQa0X..FFmD9YXqlQV
gqyEtmt8UbRreDv+WNyC3EYd3a2YlB7iafLR02ntyNSSDvMhkQvXNNF0owWN
Ll.NLBG2gwQbV7kihaWGEQVsHzuiEqFDCqwl8vuuQbEaeFBMmbjUTsV6up7x
kYmjXkWpJFywwvZ9L8aDBAPHB7Y3232WScHvpNMW9ytNcXM2Vy8gPqDh5iwX
iNFBraqo7P6uqD02naRRG1eXb0GBdRRG1e3Sn+DkNr+DWpOaxjjNr+jFvvIJ
cXOLaUlyLIoC6QYqxdpIIcXO3ZUp1MEoCzf3Ry1I+ezzJ67g8ZMbha1sRz5n
AAmluqbTNYrGS2M+lgOFDcJtTPSqMYM5HzxQtkF9A6dqLKZP3pLtfrV1lw7p
Xq1FVY8MCqLHpULShb73e72QmIItY3D6gthlngthrG5JZhF5JxdnqnIZnqH6
gthlngthrG5JZhF5pm8WopGX5QG8dw6hpAYJ307M9Ctn2p+Y+MH+PZfGBFCh
Rh78eE80lXnCSNy1smvCNPmGuj8Dvq1rP81.DGxu0HUVtiRlGF.f9AI6+od.
d+4v3X+nn8YIpbQyjj49AdgPu8k4eHUk694S5j3pCxY21u2r8j2sIuyT8Pat
qpmVzoOur7z8M2uBn3yeGK3uOoqyxJ3TlnZwVpX8hz5xmICxG3lycx746M4z
dOMrd.q2bWuZSHpgsp79p8JdcY5d1sEHNG.dFoRn1MYMZlGZ2fBiZZcpRR+t
OeKAAM2y6SPlA6wki20PPdmBhPWCtC9IwcImhb5OX3kYlruG7gK4War1JZ36
RzAmineefT2Kn2PVdCrXLSywEEMa4AsXTBQ5G+6lMSP785KoLykZeVx0ielV
00IqKtT5MTHcEVWZ1yCuD56ZZpzwYIql1vmR3IEodMBUvKUEM6EA8RI28y69
O7KZv9.
-----------end_max5_patcher-----------
</code></pre>