Search found 209 matches

by andreaagostini
Sat May 02, 2020 8:49 pm
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: Strange Quantization Issue
Replies: 5
Views: 3836

Re: Strange Quantization Issue

Hi,
could you please post a reduced version patch with steps to reproduce? Also, there are some abstractions missing.
Thanks,
andrea
by andreaagostini
Mon Mar 23, 2020 12:02 am
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: musicxml import problem
Replies: 1
Views: 2885

Re: musicxml import problem

Hi Robin,

it works fine here. Are you using the latest version of bach? Which platform are you on?

andrea
by andreaagostini
Wed Jan 01, 2020 11:27 am
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: bach.eval and maxdepth question
Replies: 2
Views: 2781

Re: bach.eval and maxdepth question

Hi, thanks for the report, it actually appears that the mindepth attribute of map is not working correctly. I'm going to look into it. As for Chris's example, it works as expected---but I understand that might be somewhat surprising, and it might be interesting to implement a different behavior. Thi...
by andreaagostini
Thu Nov 28, 2019 11:37 am
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: bach.eval - length of expressions
Replies: 4
Views: 3715

Re: bach.eval - length of expressions

Hello Jonathan, I can confirm the issue. It not about the length of the expression, but specifically to the : operator. By the way, the dot operator has the same problem. For now, you can adopt Daniele's solution, or—for a more general case—add parens: ($x1:1) ($x2:2) ($foo.'three') and so on will w...
by andreaagostini
Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:00 pm
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: Prevent Max console clutter?
Replies: 2
Views: 2507

Re: Prevent Max console clutter?

Hi,
I'm sorry, what you're seeing in the Max console are just debug messages for internal use that we have forgotten to suppress in the distributed version of bach.
It's fixed for the next release.
Cheers,
andrea
by andreaagostini
Fri May 10, 2019 7:29 am
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: Font issues in Windows
Replies: 18
Views: 82150

Font issues in Windows

Hi, several users have reported recently that there are severe display issues in Windows, as music fonts are not shown correctly. As far as we are aware, this only happens with Max 8.0.5, so if this is an option for you we advise to stick to Max 8.0.4 for the moment. In the meantime, we are investig...
by andreaagostini
Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:16 pm
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: articulations and xml
Replies: 3
Views: 2864

Re: articulations and xml

Hi, there has been substantial work in the xml area since we released the first bach 0.8, so my advice is to hold your breath for bach 0.8.1. The plan is to release it shortly, as we have kept saying since quite a long time: but this time I’m confident it’s real! On the other hand, if you want to se...
by andreaagostini
Thu Jan 24, 2019 9:13 am
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: Parse and format llll with javascript array
Replies: 1
Views: 2353

Re: Parse and format llll with javascript array

Good question. I'm afraid there is no direct way. On the top of my head, I'd say that the easiest would be making a js function receiving data from bach.iter, and rebuilding the array from individual elements of the llll. And, vice-versa, iterating recursively over the array and passing the individu...
by andreaagostini
Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:49 pm
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: Read SDIF files
Replies: 8
Views: 7644

Re: Read SDIF files

Hi, sorry for the late follow-up. I'm unable to reproduce the issue—I tried Max 7 32- and 64-bit and Max 8 (64-bit only) with various SDIF files, including the one in this forum thread, and everything works correctly here. Hopefully, with the forthcoming version of bach things will work... Sorry for...
by andreaagostini
Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:30 am
Forum: bach: automated composer's helper
Topic: unique value in bach.expr random(0, 100) WITHOUT variables
Replies: 1
Views: 2544

Re: unique value in bach.expr random(0, 100) WITHOUT variables

Hi,
yep, that's definitely a bug which I thought was fixed long ago.
Thanks for the report,
andrea